Jan 092013
 

This post is contributed by Nechama Kenig, Pedagogical Coordinator, World ORT Kadima Mada, Israel. This piece first appeared on eJewish Philanthropy on 9 January 2013.

Science and technology are fundamental factors in the growth and development of every society. And, as Elizabeth Marincola, President of the Washington DC-based Society for Science and the Public, put it recently, strong STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) education is vital to students’ success in an increasingly technological and global economy. It is a critical building block for exploration, innovation, and the economy, and the catalyst to attack problems affecting the world… and it is a catalyst for jobs.

So, it should go without saying that the under-representation of women in STEM fields is a potentially massive loss economically – as well as a black mark against those societies which fail to nurture girls’ abilities.

In general, Israeli women are grossly underrepresented in the higher echelons of industry and business: only five per cent of CEOs, 15 percent of company directors and 18 percent of executives are female, according to Catalyst, an NGO dedicated to creating more inclusive workplaces.

Likewise, the more technological the occupation, the fewer women are working in it: only eight percent of hardware engineers are women, for example, in a country where 49 percent of the overall workforce is female.

About 55 percent of PhD graduates are women, most of them in Education and Humanities, but only 12 percent in Engineering and 25 percent in Science. Meanwhile, 48 percent of lecturers are women but only 19 percent of
professors are – and that figure shrinks to 15 per cent in STEM subjects.

Israel is not the only country with a problem: new research funded by the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council shows that girls in particular are put off science careers because it is ‘geeky’ and male dominated. This may explain the findings of an earlier study, by the Institute of Physics, which revealed that nearly half of England’s state schools did not have any girls studying physics at an advanced level.

In the former Soviet Union and Argentina, World ORT-affiliated educators have been working to overcome the cultural influences which inhibit girls from pursuing science and technology.

However, while some of the factors behind the under-representation of women in STEM appear to be common to many countries, there are some aspects which are unique to the Jewish State.

Israel is a country of stark contrasts – a liberal democratic secular state with an enviably innovative, high-tech industrial sector second only to the United States, many of its citizens have an overarching commitment to ethnic and religious identities and beliefs which can be as conservative as they are enriching.

Motherhood and family are still key social values in Israeli society and, as in other countries, it is usually the women whose careers falter as they become the primary care-givers. In addition, the traditional expectations placed on women in various Israeli communities mean that girls can be deterred from pursuing an education in the first place.

Uprooting a family to pursue post-doctoral research abroad would be a challenge for any family but in Israel, where overseas post-doc is particularly favored, the difficulties can be greatly intensified.

As the British research quoted above shows, girls can be put off science careers by the prospect of being part of a minority in a male-dominated sphere. That feeling is compounded for Arab women who are already part of a minority within Israeli society.

The quintessential Israeli factor is the IDF – most of us cannot think of Israel without an image of a friend, relative or anonymous twinkle-eyed hero shouldering unbelievable responsibilities for their tender age. But it is much more than a “people’s army” – it is arguably the country’s single most influential shaper of social values and economic prospects. Indeed, many a high-tech career effectively started during service in an elite IDF unit. But, until Alice Miller’s landmark petition to the Israeli Supreme Court in 1993 (see page 10 of this document), such units were a no-go zone for women. And while gender equality has improved in the years since, women are still underrepresented among their rank.

The education system could – and should – be part of the solution. So far, however, it has been part of the problem.

In the classroom, boys tend to receive more of their teachers’ time than girls, according to research by Anat Zohar, associate professor at the school of education of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Not only that, they receive
more elaborate answers.

There is every reason to suspect that, in Math, teachers unconsciously transfer fear of the subject and undermine girls’ performance, as described in research by Sian Beilock, professor in the Department of Psychology at The University of Chicago. Indeed, girls tend to internalize failure, blaming what they perceive to be their poor abilities, while boys tend to blame a test as unfair if they score poorly. Just the existence of tired stereotypes which portray STEM subjects as “not girly” create a vicious cycle in which female students’ anxiety undermines their performance.

However, that is not to say that gender does not play a role in the classroom – boys and girls do, for example, have different learning styles. Researchers in Israel found that the 3:1 ratio of boys to girls in a physics class could be put down to two major factors: an over-competitive learning environment and the algorithmic teaching method, both of which favor boys’ learning style.

There is hope, however. Israel has developed many programs over the years, both governmental and non-governmental, which work towards the advancement of women in science and technology, and encourage the education of girls in these fields.

Mind the Gap was established by a group of female engineers from Google Israel in collaboration with the Israeli National Center of Computer Science Teachers. Groups of female high school students are brought into the Google office each month and told about computer science and its applications; they also meet female engineers in informal environment and experience their working environment. After these visits, 40 percent of the girls choose to study computer science.

The Technion, meanwhile, has Electricity in the Palm of Her Hands, in which girls listen to lectures, watch demonstrations, visit laboratories, and meet with female graduate and undergraduate students; they experience the interdisciplinary, multifaceted nature of electrical engineering and the variety of topics it encompasses.

World ORT, as part of its general mission to raise the attractiveness, availability and quality of science and technology teaching in Israel’s peripheral communities, has introduced girls and boys to the joys of robotics and computer programming through its Mabat program. And the Bloomfield Science Museum in Jerusalem has TWIST (Towards Women in Science and Technology), an after-school program featuring Twisty the virtual puppet, inspired by the comments of the many science professionals who say that it was an informal experience that piqued their interest in science and fueled their decision to pursue a science career.

But it is teachers who can have the biggest impact simply in the way they handle the mundane task of class. They can encourage their female students by teaching them that academic abilities are expandable and improvable, by adjusting the learning environment to meet their, as well as boys’, needs; to distance girls from negative stereotypes; and to expose them to female role models.

The changes have to be on the social level by increasing the awareness of the under-representation of women in science, encouraging and supporting mothers in the workforce and in academics, and judging women by the quality of their work and not by the number of hours they spend in the office. We have to help men and women to identify their passion in life.

Sep 242012
 

Games have been around for millennia and, all, debatably, have a degree of educational merit whether it be strategy, maths or more fundamental understanding of reality, life and culture. But this is not enough. Can games be used to teach deep and specific concepts? Can games make dry subjects enjoyable? Can games give often dislocated concepts a context? Can games focus students and keep them on task in this sound-bite, quick-fix, instant-fame culture they are growing up in?

Gaming Student

There are several attributes of gaming that make it an attractive strategy for education. Games, especially of the electronic variety, enjoy a high ranking in a wide range of people’s choice of leisure time. If more learning could be smuggled into that time (and probably be more effective than sleep-tapes) that alone would extend learning outside of school.

You just have to look at people’s faces to know how engaged they are when playing games. You can guess at the quality of that engagement by the complex manoeuvres, fiendish puzzles and RSI achieved by the gamer. Clever folks like scientists and programmers have co-opted that dopamine rush and turned tedious tasks into successful games such as protein folding and language translation.

Continue reading »

Aug 302012
 

Sendy and Ronit organized their community’s first “Mitzvah Day”. Sara has set up a Jewish film club, whilst Vera has started a children’s dance ensemble.  Dina has set up a new youth club. Anezka and Karolina have edited their local community magazine. All have made a positive contribution to their Jewish communities – in Istanbul, Warsaw, Mogilev, Barcelona and Prague, to name but a few.

What these young people have in common is that they are graduates of World ORT’s Future Leaders Program – an intensive nine-month leadership scheme for 16-18 year olds, designed to develop a new generation of Jewish community leaders across Europe and the former Soviet Union. The second cycle of the Future Leaders Program is now open for applications until 28th September 2012.

The program provides participants with a set of tools and experiences which equip them to support Jewish activities and develop new initiatives back in their home communities.

Continue reading »

Aug 242012
 

While many teachers are weighing up the pros and cons of using it, Facebook has become a household name throughout the world (with China excepted perhaps). So what are the reasons for not using it to communicate and collaborate with students and colleagues. For many it is seen as inappropriate to mix social circles with professional circles and educational circles. That’s why Google+ started, and is still trying, with circles after all.  Another reason is that intrusive advertising, trivial apps and endless flotsam in your feed drown out the education message.  Educators in the ORT network certainly see the need for internet based course management with examples from Argentina and a developing project based on Moodle in Israel.

So, what is needed is a school specific version of FB that limits communication to the education system, replaces the ads with more useful, interesting and relevant information, provides educational apps and games, where the students and the teacher’s personal information is respected and kept private, where cloud based docs and videos are integrated and where the teacher has some degree of control.

Step up Lore, Edmodo and Schoology. All free and all baying to take hold as the platform of choice for schools. But you’ll have to place your bets on bug fixes, new features, integration and longevity. Of these Edmodo has been around the longest (Blackboard might actually claim this accolade but its offering suffers universal derision and isn’t free). Edmodo also has the largest user count and the greatest number of languages supported – but Schoology is growing and attracting a good level of funding (as is Lore) to support that growth.  The word in the educational blogosphere is that Schoology is the one to place your bets on. Here’s why…

Continue reading »

 Posted by at 2:57 pm
Aug 062012
 

Anastasia from Samara wrote about a tiny Torah scroll and a painted Pesach Haggada – her family’s heirlooms passed down through the generations.  Students in Bishkek researched the life of Boris M. Shapiro – a key contributor to the revival of Jewish culture in Kyrgyzstan. Sara from Chernivtsi created a family tree. Students in Odessa found out about their community’s historical synagogues and Jewish hospital. Elena from Dnipropetrovsk recorded recipes passed down in her family from her great grandmother Nechama.

These are all outcomes from the first year of “Chibur” – a World ORT educational project motivating young Jews in countries of the former Soviet Union, Baltic States and Eastern Europe to take an active interest in collecting and documenting their local and family histories.  Students have created highly informative individual and group blogs – which you can browse at chibur.ort.org – to record and share the stories of their Jewish communities and ancestry. Over 200 students from 13 schools – both ORT and non-ORT – were involved, with the best blogs winning prizes. In addition, 140 teachers from across the region attended training seminars designed to familiarize them with using historical research and blogging tools in their teaching.

What are the educational aims of Chibur? We want students to develop a sense of excitement about the revival of Jewish life in their countries. We want them to appreciate the importance of preserving their heritage. We want them to develop important “21st century skills”: using technology; conducting independent research; curating material; presenting findings in clear and attractive ways. And we want teachers to feel increasingly confident to support their students in all of the above.

Our plans for the second year involve extending the project to include Latvia and Czech Republic, as well as any other countries who are interested.

Jul 232012
 

The Horizon Reports identify and describe emerging technologies that are likely to have a significant impact on education around the globe. The recently-released K-12 report  focuses on technologies that we can expect to become mainstream within the next few years and that have the potential to transform the processes of teaching, learning, and creative inquiry internationally.

It has been interesting to follow the development of the report over the last few months on the Horizon Report’s wiki where lively discussions between experts in both technology and education continue throughout the year. Dealing with a wide range of issues such as the impact of technology on wider society, changes in the future workplace, the abundance of resources and relationships available online, each of these topics is presented collaboratively. The results help to identify not only the opportunities for schools, but also some of the challenges that they need to be discussing and planning for today.

In the near-term (within a year), the report predicts that mobile devices and apps will continue to become more pervasive in the classroom as smartphones and tablets (not only iPads!) become more sophisticated and connectivity becomes increasingly ubiquitous. The report contains plenty of case-studies and links to research for those who wish to learn more.

The second set of predictions deals with the mid-term (two to three years) and describes the wider integration of game-based learning and the personal learning environments – using technology to move towards a more student-centred approach to both formal and informal learning. The Education department at World ORT are particularly interested in the inclusion of serious games as this is going to be more fully explored with a group of our own educators during the next Wingate Seminar entitled “Serious games and gamification of learning” later this year.

Perhaps the most exciting chapter of the report deals with the far-term horizon (four to five years ahead) where we can expect to see an increase in augmented reality – the layering of information over real world objects, settings, and processes – and the mainstream use of natural user interfaces that react to touch, movement, voice, and even facial expressions. Plenty of examples are provided for each of these, although not all from K-12 learning, but it seems that these technologies will be with us sooner than we may think.

Although sometimes criticised as over-optimistic, the message from the Horizon Report is clear that we need to spend more time familiarising ourselves with the opportunities that these developments can offer us. We need to prepare our educators to discover how best these innovations can serve their needs and the needs of their students and to invest time planning for change. Discussions about implementing new ideas will need to reach beyond the ‘tech-evangelists’ and our strategies for change will need to be inclusive and creative if they are to achieve a positive transformation in K-12 education.

 Posted by at 10:03 am
Jul 102012
 

In this post, Aviva Landie – a teacher at CIM-ORT Mexico – talks about a Facebook page, a viral video and a subsequent innovative project she carried out with her 2nd and 3rd grade technology students.

“I wanted to do something different and exciting to end the school year. After I came across a Facebook page on “Caine’s Arcade”, I knew exactly what I would propose to my 2nd and 3rd grade technology students.  After I showed them a short 10-minute video clip on “Caine’s Arcade”, they didn’t even let me propose the idea before all of my students with huge excitement asked, “Can we build our own arcade?” I was so happy to see so much enthusiasm. I told them that we would answer a few questions about the video, and then as a class decide exactly what we wanted to do with this project.

They accessed the classroom blog where I had posted a few questions about the video and we answered the questions together as a class. The one question they had difficulty answering was the question about the flash mob. They had difficulties understanding how so many people showed up to surprise Caine in the video, so we discussed what a flash mob is and how anyone with an account can create an event on a social media site like Facebook and invite people from all over the world (similar to how the flash mob was created in “Caine’s Arcade”). I also showed them a few videos of different flash mobs that have been uploaded to YouTube in order for them to see the different kinds of flash mobs that have taken place around the world.

Already knowing the answer to my question, I asked if they would be interested in building their own arcade, and without much surprise the – entire – class actually agreed on the same thing for the first this school year. I asked them to break up into small groups and draw a “design” with a list of materials that they would need to build their arcade. They worked on their design during two different class periods as they began bringing in all the materials. Once they had a well thought-out design, they were allowed to start building their arcade. Groups started creating, taping, painting, and enjoying every minute they put into building their arcade. Students actually asked if they could take their arcade home in order to be able to get together with their groups and work over the weekend! It was truly incredible to see my students so engaged, enthusiastic, and committed to their work.

There are so many pedagogical benefits from this project. My students watched the video on YouTube, accessed the classroom blog, learned about glash mobs, worked collaboratively in groups, and most importantly they were learning by doing. They used critical thinking in determining how they were going to take what they had sketched out in their designs and apply it to the building process of their arcade. Lots of critical thinking and problem solving skills were used in determining how they could make their arcade less challenging or in some cases more challenging in order to attract more people to play. There was a lot of collaboration throughout the entire process. One specific example of this was when they had to decide and assign as a team who would bring what in terms of materials.

I was so happy with such positive results that I joined the group “Caine’s Arcade” on Facebook and posted a few pictures that I took of my students while they were working on their arcade. One day after posting the pictures, one of the pictures I had posted had 260 likes. A few days later, a news reporter from NBC Los Angeles contacted me and asked for permission to use the pictures I had posted in her news report about Caine’s Arcade.

It’s truly incredible how social media and technology connects the world in so many different ways. Caine’s Arcade provided my students the opportunity to create, collaborate, think critically, use technology, and with the opportunity to learn a few things about entrepreneurship. And everything was made possible as a result of the passion and dedication of Caine Monroy, a nine-year old boy from Los Angeles, CA.”

Jul 042012
 

This post is contributed by Marcelo Lewkow, National Director of ORT Chile.

It often seems as if everyone in the education world today is racing to keep up-to-date with the latest technological developments and to integrate the latest technical gadgets into their teaching. The benefits of using technology to engage students in the classroom are well-rehearsed, and I have no wish to dispute them. Nevertheless, I have been involved in a project which prevents school students from using technological devices in school.  Let me give the background and explain the rationale…

Maimonides School in Santiago, Chile, is an orthodox Jewish school which achieves consistently high academic results. The school makes frequent use of technology where it enhances the teaching and learning environment – both inside of the classroom and for homework/extension tasks. We certainly have all the technological equipment that we need. However, we have decided to ban students completely from using their own communication devices – smart phones, tablets, or anything else – inside school. Of course, much of the received wisdom nowadays is that making use of students’ own devices for positive educational purposes in the classroom will involve them more in their studies.  So why are we going against the grain?

This generation of school students is permanently “connected” – via instant messaging, via Facebook, via music sharing sites and via many other platforms. Absorption in this online world can often come at the expense of developing meaningful face-to-face relationships – for children especially. At Maimonides, we think that schools can offer one of the last places for addressing this and for reducing the “noise” which comes from being constantly connected. We want students to relate to their teachers and peers on a person-to-person level, not always interrupted by technological distractions.

As a by-product, this decision has helped us also to reduce the amount of contact between students and their parents during the school day. Students would sometimes worry or mislead their parents by contacting them immediately after any minor incident that happened at school. This would also result in teachers feeling undermined, if parents knew better than them what had been going on at school. The distance at school between students and their parents is a healthy space for growth, and should remain this way. Our policy has helped to maintain this space.

Much educational research points to the fact that education is an inherently social activity. If there is no real interaction, there is no real learning. Online interaction is great, but it cannot be the only kind of interaction. That is why we are going back to basics at Maimonides and refocusing the way that our students communicate – between themselves, with staff and with their parents.

Jun 292012
 

“We have reached a point at which educational systems must and might finally undergo fundamental change.”

Taking this view as the starting-point for his presentation, Dr. Jorge Grunberg traces the evolution of classroom technology and charts the current social forces which are shaping fundamental change in education settings worldwide. Using the concept of “disruptive innovation”, he analyzes the potential of various new technologies to stimulate new teaching paradigms.

Dr. Jorge Grunberg is the Rector of Universidad ORT Uruguay in Montevideo.

“The Education Spring” – Dr. Jorge Grunberg

View more PowerPoint from HarrisLorie
Jun 252012
 

Dr Ephraim Buhks is the Director of ORT United States Operations.  In this interview post, he outlines his thoughts on:

  • the changing landscape of higher education in the USA
  • the challenges that this presents
  • how ORT colleges, both in the USA and worldwide, are well positioned to respond to these challenges

Could you provide some background to the current state of higher education in the USA?

There are approximately 6,700 higher education institutions in the USA. These institutions enjoy a significant amount of teaching flexibility, because they are not subject to any national education standards. However, if institutions wish their students to be able to receive government-sponsored financial aid, they must have accreditation – which is awarded by non-governmental agencies. Gaining accreditation is a very tough process: it can take 5 years for an institution to satisfy the 12 or so standards that are laid out. These standards include school management, instructor credentials, curriculum development and facilities. This accreditation system creates a hugely competitive environment and forces institutions to specialize by targeting specific student populations.

Annual tuition costs are high – $25,000 on average.  If you factor in accommodation, textbooks and laptops, costs are pushing $50,000. Clearly, families face great difficulties in finding this money. Many students work alongside their study. Parents and students take out large loans, which can amount to $0.5 million if you count graduate school. So student debt is very high, whilst at the same time, educational and employment outcomes are not very high. Only half of students taking a bachelor degree complete it within six years (the normal duration should be four years). The graduation rate at the largest state universities is even lower – around one third. And even if students do successfully graduate, they are finding it more and more difficult to find jobs. The unemployment rate for recently graduated students is close to 50%. Those who do secure employment will get paid at one third of what they could have expected five years ago.

Why are students graduating from US universities today finding it so difficult to find jobs?

There are three main reasons to account for this.  The first is the recession – economies worldwide are not generating a sufficient number of job openings. The second is globalization – the increasingly global competition for jobs in the USA means that even entry-level graduate positions are attracting well-trained professionals with practical work experience.  US graduates are doubly disadvantaged because they are receiving the wrong kind of education to make them employable – and this is the third reason.

Traditionally, the US model of higher education is based on a European liberal arts education. Students can actually spend more than half of their course studying subject areas unrelated to their major subject. The argument is that this system creates well-rounded individuals with well-developed critical thinking skills. It certainly employs a large number of History, English and Philosophy professors who encourage their students to discover themselves and follow their dreams. The problem with this is that there is no focus on job skills. Moreover, vocational training was practically eliminated from all college curricula, in favour of giving equal opportunities to all students in pursuing a liberal arts education. In the past, successful US companies would hire liberal arts graduates and put them on corporate training schemes for sales, marketing and banking positions. Not today – they cannot afford to, and anyway they have access to a globalized labour market.

So this is the major political, economic and social issue which we will face for many years to come: the role of higher education in skills training, job creation and maintaining the US as a competitive player in the global economy.

What other trends are emerging in higher education in the USA?

  1. Study abroad has become a major development. US colleges and universities have rushed to sign course exchange agreements with institutions overseas. Students now frequently spend a semester or a whole year studying abroad – based on the notion that a global economy puts international study and work experience at a premium. In addition, major US universities have opened campuses overseas – for example New York University in Bahrain. However, these expansions have not always been economically successful, given that the universities in question must compete with the low tuition costs of state-subsidized national institutions already set up in the country.
  2. Distance and online learning has become a mainstream way of teaching, often as part of a blended curriculum combining regular and online classes. Whilst this is undoubtedly the direction which education is taking, there are a number of questions about the quality of distance learning which universities have been providing and the large profits that they have been making.

How are ORT US Operations’ colleges succeeding in this environment?

ORT US Operations has colleges in New York, Los Angeles and Chicago. We offer affordable two-year college degree and certificate programs, with skills training and job placement assistance. The average job placement rate is 85%.   Places at our colleges are in demand – our enrolment has doubled over the last three years.

Our program expansion is focused on service industries with well-paid entry level jobs. We have targeted the areas of healthcare, renewable energy, computer game design and the paralegal profession.

It looks like our approach is in line with the thinking of President Obama and his administration. Despite a number of inevitable funding cuts affecting the higher education sector, the President has announced an initiative to increase the proportion of the adult population who go on to higher education from a third to half. Significantly, the most important role will be assigned to community colleges offering two-year programs, in particular skills training programs.

Given the backdrop to education in the USA which you have sketched out for us, what are the opportunities for World ORT and national ORT organizations?

World ORT has something that most large colleges and universities can only dream about: an international presence. In today’s world, global education is at a premium. Study abroad, international student programs (see, for example, the English and Science Summer School) and foreign language courses combined with on-line teaching elements could all be added or incorporated into ORT national programs. ORT US Ops would welcome ORT students from many countries to study at ORT colleges in the US.

It is gratifying to note that the ORT model of skills-based and vocational training – developed more than a century ago – is still in high demand today. World ORT should build its future programs on this model. Its expertise in high-level technologies is already being, and will increasingly be, sought out by multinational companies. The new industrial world – countries like China and India – could become the next area to focus our energies on.

I would be delighted to answer questions from any blog readers, and would certainly love to work towards developing cooperative programs with World ORT and ORT national organizations.